|
IMPORTANT INFORMATION |
|
|
GLASFORD , IL WATER PERMIT# IL1430350 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report for period 1/1/07 to 12/31/07 |
|
|||
|
A Source Water Assessment Summary: To determine Glasford's susceptibility to groundwater contamination, a Well Site Survey, published in 1991 by the Illinois EPA, and Source Water Protection Plan were reviewed. Based on the information contained in these documents, fourteen potential sources of groundwater contamination are present that could pose a hazard to groundwater pumped by the Glasford community water supply wells. These include two stores/sales, a laundry, a below ground fuel storage, two machine shops/sheds, a fire station, a school, a hardware store, a printing, a photographic service, a grain elevator, an auto body, and an above ground fuel storage. Based on information provided by Glasford water supply officials, the following facilities, also indicted as potential sources in the site data table, have changed their status: Glasford Service Center (gone--business office), Illini Discount Auto Parts (gone--building demolished), Timber Hollis Fire Protection (moved to 575 feet from Well #1 and 400 feet from Well 2), and Glasford Grade School (gone--empty building). Based upon this information, the Illinois EPA has determined that Glasford Wells #1 and #2 are not susceptible to IOC, VOC, or SOC contamination. This determination is based on a number of criteria including: monitoring conducted at the wells; monitoring conducted at the entry point to the distribution system; and the available hydrogeologic data for the wells. In anticipation of the U.S. EPA's proposed Ground Water Rule, the Illinois EPA has determined that Glasford's community water supply wells are not vulnerable to viral contamination. This determination is based upon the evaluation of the following criteria during the Vulnerability Waiver Process: the community's wells are properly constructed with sound integrity and proper site conditions; there is a hydrogeologic barrier that restricts pathogen movement; all potential routes and sanitary defects have been mitigated such that the source water is adequately protected; monitoring data did not indicate a history of disease outbreak; and the sanitary survey of the water supply did not indicate a viral contamination threat. However, having stated this, the U.S. EPA is proposing to require States to identify systems in karst, gravel and fractured rock aquifer systems as sensitive. Water systems utilizing these aquifer types would be required to perform routine source water monitoring. Because the community's wells are constructed in a confined aquifer, which should provide an adequate degree of protection to prevent the movement of pathogens into the wells, well hydraulics were not considered to be a significant factor in the vulnerability determination. The Illinois Environmental Protection Act provides minimum protection zones of 200 feet for the Village of Glasford's wells. These minimum protection zones are regulated by the Illinois EPA. Because the village has proceeded with source water protection efforts, the facility has received a monitoring waiver for its wells. To further minimize the risk to the village's groundwater supply, the Illinois EPA recommends that three additional activities be assessed. First, the village may wish to enact a "maximum setback zone" ordinance. These ordinances are authorized by the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and allow county and municipal officials the opportunity to provide additional protection up to a fixed distance, normally 1,000 feet, from their wells. Second, the water supply staff may wish to revisit their contingency planning documents. Contingency planning documents are a primary means to ensure that, through emergency preparedness, a community will minimize their risk of being without safe and adequate water. Finally, the water supply staff is encouraged to review their cross connection control program to ensure that it remains current and viable. Cross connections to either the water treatment plant (for example, at bulk water loading stations) or in the distribution system may negate all of the source water protection initiatives provided by the community and circumvent the natural protection provided to the aquifer. |
|||
|
2007 Regulated Contaminants Detected |
|
Lead and Copper Date Sampled: 12/31/2007 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Definitions: Action Level (AL): The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. Action Level Goal (ALG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. ALG's allow for a margin of safety. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Water Quality Test Results: Definitions: The following tables contain scientific terms and measures, some of which may require explanation. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCL's are set as close to the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal as feasible using the best available treatment technology. Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLG's allow for a margin of safety. mg/l: milligrams per litre or parts per million - or one ounce in 7,350 gallons of water. ug/l: micrograms per litre or parts per billion - or one ounce in 7,350,000 gallons of water.na: not applicable.Avg: Regulatory compliance with some MCLs are based on running annual average of monthly samples. Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL): The highest level of disinfectant allowed in drinking water. Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG): The level of disinfectant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLG's allow for a margin of safety. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regulated Contaminants |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: The state requires monitoring of certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Therefore, some of this data may be more than one year old. |
|
2007 Violation Summary Table: This table is intended to assist you in the identification of year 2007 violation(s) that are required to be reported and explained in your CCR. The table does NOT include the required explanation of the noted violation(s) and you will need to provide this information as explained in the CCR Guidance Manual. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GLASFORD has taken the following actions specific to the VIOLATION(S) listed above: COMMENCED CONSTRUCTION OF HMO WATER TREATMENT FACILITY WITH PROJECTED COMPLETION DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2008. |